These days, it seems too many people have
come to believe, as Shakespeare almost put it, “All the world's a game, And all the men and women merely players.”
Here are 2 deadly serious examples of what I mean.
Let the NSA spy indiscriminately on us, and we’ll try and beat them at
their own game.
“From Silicon Valley to the South Pacific,” the Associated
Press reported this week, “counterattacks to revelations of widespread National
Security Agency surveillance are taking shape, from a surge of new encrypted
email programs to technology that sprinkles the Internet with red flag terms to
confuse would-be snoops.”
In a way, this report also plays a popular news media game, the “trend”
story, in which a few micro-scale fragments of the real world are inflated into
a global movement.
Here is some of the evidence cited by the AP to show a digital world
enflamed:
--- “[Encryption] Developer Jeff Lyon in Santa Clara, Calif.,
said that 2,000 users have installed [his Flagger service] to date.”
--- “Pretty Good Privacy, or
PGP, a free encryption service was being loaded about 600 times a day in the
month before Snowden’s revelations broke. Two months later, that had more than
doubled to 1,380, according to a running tally maintained by programmer
Kristian Fiskerstrand.”
--- “Berlin-based
email provider Posteo claims to have seen a 150 percent surge in paid subscribers
due to the “Snowden effect,” to 25,000 in the past four months.”
WOWIE ZOWIE!!! Add ‘em all together,
and accept the advocates’ figures as accurate, and you get about 100,000 new
encryptors out of, what, a billion users of the global internet.
But wait, AP says, there’s
more: “CryptoParties are springing up around the world as well. They are small
gatherings where hosts teach attendees, who bring their digital devices, how to
download and use encrypted email and secure Internet browsers.”
That’ll show those NSA
bastards!
The “trend” would be laughable
were the plans of these “digital rebels” not so awful.
Flagger Boy Lyons says, “The goal here is to get a critical mass
of people flooding the Internet with noise and make a statement of civil
disobedience.”
While Electronic Frontier Foundation activist Parker Higgens in
San Francisco wants everybody to encrypt, because, he says, “Encryption loses
its value as an indicator of possible malfeasance if everyone is using it.”
Absurd, absurder, reductio
ad absurdum: “University of Auckland associate professor Gehan Gunasekara
said he’s received ‘overwhelming support’ for his proposal to ‘lead the spooks
in a merry dance,’ visiting radical websites, setting up multiple online
identities and making up hypothetical ‘friends.’
“And ‘pretty soon everyone in New Zealand will have to be under
surveillance,’ he said.”
Hey, schmuck! That’s what
the surveillance system is set up to do, and if you think you and all your
friends have the budget to out-run the spooks, good luck to you.
Increasing the scale of data-mining is as much of a challenge to
the security services as a hard, straight fastball down the middle is to a big
league hitter. And what’s the virtue of
camouflaging serious encryption with fun’n’games versions?
The point here is not to stir the hornets’ nest, make ‘em mad,
make ‘em even more hyperactive. It is
the opposite, to encourage, and if necessary, force the NSA, GCHQ and whatever
the hell New Zealand calls its spook service,-- which is already part of the NSA-led “Mighty Five”
intelligence collaborative -- to calm down, be more selective and more rational
in their surveillance collection, collation and analysis.
And making that happen is not an Effing game, any more than is
legitimate national security surveillance. The NSA et al have real jobs to do,
including protecting our freewheeling society from real enemies, whose plots,
while far fewer than the spooks and their budgets and their tactics seem to
assume, still can be truly destructive.
That their exaggerated “trend”
might have dangerous real world effects is something AP left out of their
story.
The gamesmanship of this new
generation of Jerry Rubin-style gigabit tricksters is repellant enough, but it
is literally amateur night compared to the game-playing radical-right
Republicans of the House of Representatives.
To them, the functions of the
US Government and its financial credibility are just tokens in a game to force
their will down the throat of that African-American (and can you see them
smirking at the first half of that description?) President Barack Obama.
To them, the serious
consequences of default or a government AWOL, matter less than their sense of “fair
play.”
“You can’t just demand pure
capitulation,” Boehner-buddy Representative Tom Cole, (R-OK), said, “Negotiations don’t work that way.”
A
senseless sentiment amped-up by Tea Party Rep. Marlin Stutzman (R-IN), who whined: "We’re
not going to be disrespected. We have to
get something out of this. And I don’t know what that even is.”
Stutzman seems
to think that, like his 8 year old daughter, he should get a “self-esteem”
trophy for having played the game and lost.
Not in the real
world. In the world, you need both votes
and brains to win.
Unless, like
Congressman Cole, you can tell the Washington Post that losing on Obamacare,
losing on the shutdown, losing on default, is really a win, because it “forces”
President Obama to do what he’s been asking to do for months now, use the normal
legislative process to carve out changes in Federal taxing and spending.
“Any agreement, Cole told the Post, that creates a process to litigate
broader budget issues would achieve an important GOP goal. ‘If you’re able to
do that and you’re able to get some savings out of the entitlement portion of
the budget, those aren’t Republican defeats. They are Republican victories.’”
Cole and Boehner
are free to say that, but Sen. Bob Corker (R-Tenn.) knows
better. What the GOP will get out of
their months of Provocation Theater will be, he says, “a tough vote.”
As the Post put
it, “The misguided assault on the health-care law had diverted attention from
more meaningful efforts to overhaul the tax code and rein in spending on
Medicare and Social Security, he said. And now time has run out for achieving
those goals.
“’Let’s just spell out what’s happened:’ Cole said, ‘We’ve basically blown the last two months with some of our members and a lot of the House focused on a shiny object that was never going to happen.’”
But, of course, the game isn’t over yet. Bloodied, beaten, disgraced before an American voting public which has rarely polled so strongly their disapproval of the Republican Party, the GOP can’t wait to do it all over again. For the next round of negotiations, their booby prize, they are clinging to their shameful tactic: they will once again hold the functions of the government and its full faith and credit hostage against new dates, in January and February 2014.
Let us say it one more time, civilly and quietly, in hopes that some Republicans might understand: a functioning government which pays its debts on time is something Americans want to believe in, not play with.
